![]() Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful." Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. To save you the trouble, here's the relevant portion: Read Wiki's Vandalism article for yourself and see what ASSHOLES this cadre of editors are. In late 2015 he finally collected all his research on a Pinterest page, as follows:īacking up, when he tried to edit the Wiki page starting in 2014, the conspirators reverted his edits and blocked him from editing in violation of all of Wiki's own policies, by accusing him of vandalism, allowing them to take summary action without vetting by a disinterested group of judges. This racket reached a head in 2014 when Swedish superfan Stig-Åke Persson began doing his own research, going back to newspaper articles and official records to reconstruct her life, especially the first years. A cadre of editors then formed a conspiracy to revert and suspend anybody trying to correct the false information, with the result that the false birth year et al. Her fan club began pushing the false information, not just during her life, but long after when there was no need, and corrupted the Wiki article bigtime. ![]() ![]() They also mickeyed with her birthplace and other information about her early years. When Branigan went into the music biz, her agents and publisher made her change her birth year from 1952 to 1957 to make her seem younger. Are you a Laura Branigan fan? Then Wikipedia is out to scam you about her biography. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |